Google Maps

0:00 Um I have I don't wanna spoil I have s like some stuff that I could tell you, but I don't wanna spoil it. Awesome. Well Google Maps.

0:10 Google Maps. Welcome to season five, episode three of Acquired, the podcast about great technology companies and the stories behind them. I'm Ben Gilbert and I'm the co-founder of Pioneer Square Labs, a startup studio and early stage venture fund in Seattle. And I'm David Rosenthal, and I am a general partner at Wave Capital, a early stage venture firm focused on marketplaces based in San Francisco. And we Are your hosts.

0:47 Today we are talking about Google Maps and the acquisition of three companies starting with Where2 Technologies in 2004. That set the whole thing in motion. And David, I would not have guessed it when starting the research, but there's a chance this is as big of a success, but far less discussed than our shin example of an A plus. Instagram. And listeners, over the next hour or so, we, or at least I

1:12 I'm gonna try and build that case. Well, that's actually a good question. Which probably Instagram is used more Like in terms of more individual like use of sessions. per day than Google Maps. But

1:27 I don't know. If you count all the APIs of Google Maps, like it might be close. Yeah, the the dual revenue model as one being a different front door to Google than search, and two, actually uh now selling that API access. But we will get into all of that. And more.

1:45 All right listeners. Now is a great time to talk about a new partner of ours here on Acquired, Lagora. The agentic operating system that is redefining how the world's best legal teams work. Yep. It's sort of obvious that AI is gonna completely change the legal industry. I bet most of you listening have dropped a contract into some sort of AI chat bot out there. Lagora took that insight and asked the question, what if you really built something with that power from the ground up for the legal industry? So the founders did exactly what great founders do.

2:18 operate with obsessive customer focus. They embedded inside a massive law firm for months. They sat with the lawyers just watching how the work really gets done. And that's how you get features that customers love, like tabular review, where you Drop in a folder of hundreds of contracts and it pulls every key term into a grid a lawyer can actually work with. Legor's bed here is interesting, since it lets each lawyer handle more complexity, any given person can increase the quality of their work and do higher value work. And this means that the pie can grow even as each individual task takes less time.

2:54 And they recently launched Lagora Agent, offering greater intelligence and performance. The agent lets lawyers set an objective. Then it can handle the planning and the execution and delivery of the final product. Legal teams get to maintain full control and transparency since they're still involved where judgment is required. And Lagora works where you already work. You can use it within Microsoft Word while redlining or drafting. The early Ligora numbers essentially speak for themselves. When they have a head-to-head pilot with their top competitor, they win seventy percent of the time. Legora now has over a hundred thousand lawyers on the platform from twelve hundred legal teams in fifty countries. And crazily they went from one million

3:40 Eighteen months. Truly insane numbers. And that is the real test. Plenty of things demo well, but the question is whether a busy associate actually reaches for it during crunch time, or whether a partner trusts it before going into a conversation with a major client.

3:56 If your legal team wants to check it out, whether you're a law firm or you're in house at a company, You can learn more at Lagora.com slash acquired And just tell'em that Ben and David sent you. If you like the show, you should come join the other twenty five hundred plus acquired fans that are hanging out in there. And if you want more of the show, you should become an acquired limited partner. Dave and I release one LP show for every main show, and we use these episodes to go deeper on company building topics. The last of which was on a not very well known topic with Andrew Abramson from Riviera Partners on how the best

4:31 companies in tech search and recruit for product executives. You can get started with a seven day free trial and listen right now here in the podcast player of your choice. By clicking the link in the show notes or going to glow.fm slash acquired. All right, David. I'm pretty excited to do a classic acquired episode. I know this is gonna be classic. I noticed in our El Pito read you uh you no longer say how buttery smooth it is to subscribe,'cause it is very buttery smooth, but we got a bunch of feedback in the survey that people uh people didn't like that description.

5:04 Yeah, I don't We got a lot of funny feedback in the survey. I think actually we should do an LP show on stuff we learned from the survey, because there's a lot of good of course there's like interesting demographic stuff. For example, the top two uh types of people that listen to the show are product managers and and engineers. But there's a lot of other really interesting data that I think we should we should tease out on LP show. Yeah, we totally should do that. We had what, almost eight hundred responses. Yep. Which is great. Thank you for all the feedback and some Great helpful stuff, some really funny stuff. But Mostly we just appreciate, you know, all of you for listening. It's it's super cool. So thank you. All right, David, you wanna dive into the acquisition history and facts? Let's do it.

5:43 So We go back. To Two thousand three. Relatively recent. By

5:48 Acquired standards. Yeah, we're not starting with like the the original cartographers. Yeah Someone thought of an idea of a map. It's been a busy week here at Wave, you know? No, we go back Sixteen years. To two thousand three. To Google. In Mountain View. It is

6:09 Pre IPO Google, as we're gonna see. Just pre IPO Google. They are starting to gear up. They have found their business model of paid search inspired by Overture, uh which we covered. Uh the borrowed best business model of all time. Yes. We covered uh with uh the Internet History Podcast, right? Um

6:27 Yep, yeah. Brian McCullough. Yeah. Thank you, Brian. So it's two thousand three and a young Product manager. At Google. Fresh Whose name is Brit.

6:38 Taylor. is working on A uh Little and truly little. feature of Google at the time called search by location.

6:48 The idea is that you could enter searches into Google by Location. But there's no maps. There's no it's it's like completely useless and and uh in Brett's own words, it had Zero. users per day. And I think if I remember right, you had to like use a keyword, like you were typing in the search bar and it was like location colon or something like that to scope to I mean it was like a command line function. I mean I don't remember because I didn't use it. But uh for listeners, uh the name Brett Taylor might

7:18 Sound. Familiar. Ben, do you know what uh Brett Taylor went on to do? Is he CTO of Facebook now? Well, he went on to become CTO of Facebook. Well he went on to Fen FriendFeed. He founded FriendFeed. He was CO of FriendFeed. Uh that was acquired by Facebook. Uh he became CTO of Facebook, then he left founded Quip. Which was acquired by Salesforce and he's now

7:40 the chief product officer of Salesforce. We're gonna have many illustrious Google Maps alumni as we continue throughout the episode here. Friend feed was so awesome. That was that like time in social where All of the platforms were similar enough that you could build an aggregator and that actually made sense. Like now Facebook posts have so much crazy metadata and different types associated with them. Twitter, everything has uh is so sort of unique, but Friend feed basically said, sure, connect with all your services and we'll create one feed of all your friends across all your services that wildly defies the business models of all these companies now, so that would get shut down immediately. But that was a really cool time. But you weren't done with Red Ride of aggregating uh Uber and Lyft and uh they didn't like that either.

8:26 Great idea. Not anti business model of big companies. Anyway, we digress. So it's two thousand three. Brett. Sits down with Larry Page. co founder of Google, and recently hired VP of business development, Megan Smith.

8:42 To Talk about Search by location. the state of the product, the state of the competitive market out there. And they realize look, this is not this feature is not cutting it. We need to do better. And and what was going on out there, AOL a couple years earlier had bought MapQuest. MapQuest was the leading

9:00 mappa internet mapping product out there. And it was already public. They they they bought it after it was a public company. Yeah, that's right. They bought it for a billion dollars. I think that acquisition was pre-bubble bursting. It was the most used product out there. Yahoo also had Yahoo Maps out there, which were quite popular, and Google had found out that Yahoo was doing a bunch of work uh to adding a bunch of features to Yahoo Maps and really making a push on it. And so the three of them decide We need to really compete in this space. Fortuitously, right around that same time, they get a tip from their investors, Sequoia Capital, one of their investors, that there is an interesting uh little company down under in Australia that they might want to look at.

9:44 In researching this, uh last night I discovered that MapQuest is still around. You can go to mapquest.com. The logo is something that I've never seen in my life. Cause of course it's owned by Verizon,'cause the whole AOL to Yahoo Verizon thing. Right. So it's like a still a thing you can use. It uses uh Mapbox and Um it licenses sort of maps and data. I couldn't believe it was still around,'cause like my the last time I used MapQuest, I was Like Printing out the directions so that when I was driving somewhere I could look at the piece of paper and you know, that's what you did. Well we'll well we'll get to uh state of the art in a minute. Well, that was state of the art was you

10:21 When I'm Map Quest or Yak Maps, you got some directions, you printed them out, and as you drove along or walked along, you were like looking at the sheet of paper and there was no how cool it is. This was made just for me. Yeah, they were just static pages. You entered your Starting point, your destination, and you got a static webpage that you then printed out. Down in Australia, though. There is a Motley crew of four people.

10:44 Two Danish brothers Lars and Jens Rasmison. uh who had recently moved there. They're Danish by birth. They had been in Silicon Valley in California. They had been working at a startup. That startup was called Digital Fountain. Well, it was a dot com bust. I think it ended up surviving and maybe ended up getting acquired like in the mid two thousands or something. But they laid off like m most of the people to laid off most of the people. And so the two brothers had gotten laid off. Um And they said, Okay, well, you know, it's kind of nuclear winter here, post dot com bust, but let's start something. Like, you know, we've seen we've been through this startup, we w were interested in starting a company. Lars was dating a woman who he would ultimately marry uh who was Cuban and she couldn't immigrate to the US. And so she and he decided to move to

11:31 Australia. So They moved to Australia, but he and his brother Jens are are thinking about you know, a product that they could build. And Jens had the idea that that, you know, just like we were talking about, this state of the art in mapping on MapQuest and Yahoo Maps, it kinda sucked. Like it really kinda sucked. And maybe like they could build something that was better. And his idea was that So uh if you go way back and try and remember using these sites, you would see a map, but the map wasn't like actually

12:01 The key part of the experience. It was the list of turn by turn directions on the side of the map. And the map itself was like you'd get a tiny little like you know different. Just for fun, they'd generate you this tile that's like, look, this is sort of illustrative of where you're going. And so he had the idea that the map should be front and center, just like a map and that the directions should be on the map. And the map should not be static, but it should be dynamic. And you could interact with it, you could zoom in, you could pan, you could do All of the things that we now think of as Normal modern.

12:33 mapping applications. The way he thought that you could do this was to make the map based on this concept of tiles. And each tile, it would be dynam tiles in the map and that represented a small part of it, and that they could stitch it together so that whatever view you were looking at was an aggregated view of all the little mini tiles that made up the map and you could move it around and see different tiles and whatnot. That's a brilliant

12:57 technological innovation that enables this. It's amazing to me that it both requires this sort of like breakthrough technology innovation, which is uh still how maps work today. I mean, there's a lot more vector stuff than just this sort of static tiles world, but that's what enabled this mapping revolution. But the vision innovation Big and pretty and zoomable. And searchable it itself could be a platform for other services. Like the map itself could be a platform. Could be the the mode of of interaction. So Lars is like, well, yeah, okay, this is cool. Well let's start a company around this and let's do this. So he's moved to to Australia. He convinces Jens to move to Australia and he recruits two

13:41 other engineers who are friends of theirs, Noel Gordon and Steven Ma. And the four of them start working on this. out of Noel's spare bedroom in Sydney, in Australia. They decide to name the company, Ben, as you said, Where to Technologies, Where and then the number two technologies. And they you know start talking about how they're going to do this. And like the web isn't even on their mind. Clearly the only way that you could build an application this Performant and dynamic. Would be with

14:09 Desktop. Software, right? Like it would this would be like uh you know the Encarta Encyclopedia. You know, you're gonna install this on your desktop computer and it would be super cool and you know you can find what you want, panorama, maybe you could still print out the directions eventually. How else could you do this? So they start working on it. They realize that hey, this is this is kinda cool. They might be onto something. They should search for funding, V C funding for this. Uh so Lars and Jens fly back to California.

14:34 They meet with a former Cisco executive uh that they had known who is a prolific angel investor. His name is Frank Marshall. Frank says, Okay, like this is cool. I'll introduce you to my network to a bunch of VCs, including Sequoia Capital. So they get introduced to Sequoia. And Sequoia gets pretty Excited about this. Sequoia been was investors in Google. They were investors in Yahoo, investors in in lots of, you know, great companies over the years, as we've seen many times on this show. They start talking terms and they give a unclear if this is a verbal offer or they actually gave a term sheet to the company to invest Two million dollars. for forty percent of the company. It was a different time back then, uh post bubble bursting,'cause that would be a five million dollar post money valuation selling forty percent of the company for two million dollars.

15:21 Times have have definitely changed in uh in the seed market since then. However, Before they Ink a deal. And and the brothers Are excited about this. They're like, Man, great. It's a quiet capital, one of the premier market venture firms out there that are willing to fund us here in here here in Sydney, Australia. Uh

15:38 This is great. They're excited to do it. Before they actually sign the deal though. Yahoo releases what the Google folks know that they are about to do is a big update to Yahoo Maps, and they add local yellow pages listing and it's it's clear that like, oh, okay, this is gonna be The business model here of like we're gonna have local

15:58 businesses on these maps. We're gonna sell advertising around that. People are gonna be able to find them. And this is kind of game changes in the industry. Sequoia sees this and they pull out of the deal. They say, Yeah, yeah, who's gonna be the winner here? We're not as excited about funding this start up company to try and compete with these giants anymore. Uh well this one. They still get something right, though. You know, and this is one thing um they are in many of the best, you know, big platform companies out there, and of course they're investors in Yahoo and Google. Sequoia does say as a kind of a parting gift to while passing with the brothers here and where to says, you know

16:37 With Yahoo launching this Google is gonna need to respond. And uh, you know, we're investors we're on the board of Google. Like we'll we can introduce you to them. We'll broker an introduction. So they, as we alluded to earlier, make this Introduction to Larry Page. Back in Mountain View. I don't know if I'm sure, but I assume Larson and Jens fly over again back to California. They meet with Larry and Megan.

16:59 They pitch them. This company that they're building. I think I didn't mention earlier. The the name of the software, the desktop software, is Expedition. They show them Expedition, how cool it is, they pitch them. And and Larry and Megan are Interested, but there's there's kind of two problems. One As we alluded to earlier, Google's in the middle of desktop the the smaller problem is Google's in the middle of preparing for their IPO, so all deals are on hold.

17:23 Like period indefinitely. They're not doing any MA during the quiet period while they're getting ready to go public. Uh this is two thousand four at this point. But two, yeah, it's a desktop so like we're talking about Google here. Google doesn't make desktop software. Google makes Web software. Did you see that that Larry Page quote, We like the web? Yes. Exactly. We like the way that's all Lar at the end of the meeting that's all Larry says. Like, you know, yeah, this is great, but We like the web. typical great entrepreneurial fashion. They say, Well we can do that. So they go back to Australia and the four of them and where to only the four still just four engineers. They work feverishly for three weeks

18:02 And at the end of three weeks They come back to Larry and Megan and And they say, Hey Remember how we had Expedition running on the desktop last time? Well here it is running on the web. And what they do, they have it running on a on a web browser. They use this

18:18 uh idea that was uh as best as we can tell, and and they've talked about it and Google's talked about it, kinda independently invented both by the Gmail team and Paul Bukite within Google. And also where to, while they're trying to get acquired by Google at the same time. And that's leveraging this kind of relatively unknown feature of JavaScript that Microsoft had added to Internet Explorer that allowed it to sync with allowed a web page that was already loaded. To sync with XML data.

18:47 store it on a server. So like Ordinarily, and at this time, like web pages are static. You load a webpage, everything is done, there's no processing happening on the webpage, it's static. But there is this feature that you can dynamically fetch XML data. In the background, without refreshing. Indeed. The wave of the future. The wave of the future. And uh

19:09 For all of our uh engineering audience and and probably some others you're gonna know exactly what we're talking about here. But for everyone else you may have heard of the term Ajax. Asynchronous JavaScript syncing. with XML data stored on the server. Uh short for Yeah. We're we're we're coming to the the plumbing the depths of our our engineering uh uh abilities here. All I remember is this is like a couple of years before I rewrote the the the Hudson High School website, and I remember writing a lot of XML HTTP requests and being like

19:41 This is gonna be cool like Google Maps was. So indeed, you know, I feel like we've been lately been on a um web two dot oh history kick here, but this is su becomes a Killer key building block of the whole web two dot oh era is the ability to have non static web pages via this technique. Well as part of the Slack episode we talked about Flickr. That had just launched a couple of months before. This is really like one of the key underlying technologies of the web two dot oh Renaissance. So

20:13 The where two team. They come back, they present to Larry and Megan. And they're like well, well Alright, this is this is Pretty good. And they were doubly impressed and Google was doubly impressed because again, Paul Bukite at uh on the Gmail team that was

20:27 Think I don't think Gmail had come out publicly yet. I think it was still being worked on internally. They were like at the bleeding edge of building web applications. They were doing the same thing internally. So Google's like, Wow, man, these engineers must be pretty good if they come up with this independently. So Later that summer In August, Google does complete

20:48 the public offering on August nineteenth, two thousand four. And then very shortly thereafter, probably as soon as they can, once the dust settles from the IPO, in October two thousand four, Google acquires where to Brett Taylor moves over and becomes the first PM for this new team. Uh which is rechristened from where two to Google Maps.

21:06 Very Inventive name. So you know, it was just over the summer while Where Two is building the web version of the product to try and impress Larry and Megan. Google Maps launches publicly in February two thousand five. So the acquisition is October two thousand four.

21:23 The web product is only a couple of months old. And within months. Google Maps is launched to the public. It's it's pretty incredible. I I feel like we hear this story a bunch on acquired of some of these totally world changing products. are built in just a matter of months by really, really talented engineers. one of the things that m makes this story so common on this show is

21:45 there was this time when web applications were so new that It was intuitive what was going to have product market fit. Because

21:56 There were so few web applications. I mean, I think like, oh, the first really good interactive mapping software, the first really good interactive, you name it, like there was probably a big space for it. Photo software, Flickr, video software, YouTube, you know, all of these companies. Yeah, it was the Floodgates were opened to building these applications on the web and whoever could build them fastest and best. And the web was s so slow at the time too that it's that's exactly it, fastest and best. Like there was like this was an era where technology innovations Created a a hundred X better user experience for people that made them actually use those applications. So there was lots of people that would sort of like decide that they wanted to get into this, but it it took real technical genius to, you know, work with the the internet speeds we had at the time, the browser technologies to be able to sort of like make that

22:48 possible for people. Yeah. And what's interesting is like this is pre-Google Chrome days. So actually all of the browser technologies making this possible are coming out of Microsoft. And internet. And well, and Firefox too, yeah. Uh yeah. Uh pretty incredible. All right, listeners, now is a great time to tell you about a longtime friend of the show, Vanta.

23:09 AI has scrambled the whole security picture. It used to be that you proved that you were secure once a year on audit or a static PDF, then everyone would nod and you're done. But in an AI first world, that doesn't hold up anymore. Yep, your risk surface changes every week now. A vendor turns on an AI feature or someone writes in a new model without telling IT

23:31 And your posture is different than it was last week, let alone at your last audit. Fanta's own research found that around seventy percent of companies have this quote unquote shadow AI running with no security review at all. Right. And that's where Vanta comes in. They're the leading agentic trust platform, meaning they've built the thing that closes the gap.

23:51 And the way that they close that gap is Vanta Agent. Think of it as a GRC engineer, that's governance, risk, and compliance, except that it's software and it doesn't sleep. It finds the issues, drafts the fixes, and cuts the time that you'd spend on vendor assessments in half. In half. Which is exactly why more than sixteen thousand companies today run on Vanta. Companies like Ramp, Cursor, and Snowflake.

24:15 All stay audit ready and catch the risks that crop up between audits across every vendor. Every AI tool. The whole environment. And that's the real value. Trust has to be continuous now, which is why Vanta automates your security, your compliance, and the work to earn and prove trust. We're huge fans of Vanta over here, and literally hundreds of acquired listeners have become Vanta customers at their companies over the years.

24:39 So you can get$1,000 off Vanta at vanta.com slash acquired. That's V-A-N-T-A.com slash acquired for a thousand dollars off. And just tell them. That Ben and David sent you. Okay, so rewind just slightly back to the end of two thousand four. Google also acquires two other companies in quick succession at the same time. One is a company called Keyhole. Keyhole was unlike Where Two, uh was a well funded startup, I believe located in in Silicon Valley in California. It also, though, made desktop software, uh, and it was called Earth Viewer.

25:15 And of course, as listeners can probably guess, that becomes Google Earth, which interestingly would remain desktop software for quite a number of years. And contain a flight simulator. That's right. Bennett, do you know who the CEO of Kehole was? I do not. Oh well it was I'll give you his name see if see if this rings any bells. John Hanke. Nothing.

25:44 Oh man. So John would ultimately after a couple of years become the VP of the Geo group, quote unquote, within Google. So he would be taking over all Google Earth and Google Maps responsibility as an executive for that. But then as you know oftentimes happens in big companies and at Google, uh he kind of got bored with this role and wanted to do is go back to doing something new and innovative. And he had come from the video game industry before he started Keyhole. And so he started a little project within Google that was referred to as Niantic Labs. No way. Yes. Yes. And so John is the C geospatial stuff makes a lot of sense then. Indeed. John is is now the CEO and co founder of Niantic, which of course makes Pokemon Go and the new Harry Potter game and all of the uh Ingress. And Ingr well started with Ingress. Yeah. And um all of well actually it started with I think it was Field Trip, which was a application built on

26:39 Google Maps to that could show like interesting um points of interest around you with you if you held up your phone and like panned it around. But yeah, certainly by far the most successful augmented reality. uh game or probably application period out there right now. Yeah. Yeah, for sure. I mean w i uh it is funny. I think when people talk about the emerging AR market, I I think that's the widest used AR market. That is the market. Yeah. Yeah. Pokemon Go, that's the market. Uh that was Keyhole. Google also acquires a company called Zip Dash, a very, very small company. I believe they paid two million dollars for for Zip Dash. Zip Dash was also based in in Silicon Valley in California. And they were providing creating real time traffic data on streets.

27:23 And they were Getting that data. Both from and sending it to uh mobile phones, of course. Like that is when you would want traffic data is when you're you have your mobile phone with you while you're driving. There's a giant market of Only for Nextel phones at the time of the acquisition. Uh those had the sweet like walkie talkie. Yeah, the push to connect. Oh man. I never had one of those, but I always wanted it. Yeah, the commercials were great. I thought the commercials were awesome. So the uh the zip dash team by far

27:54 You know, the most insignificant of the three of these acqu acquisitions, uh To this day, the where to acquisition price is still undisclosed. It it was a mix of cash and stock. That's the most we know, but I think it was less than fift million. Like I think it was a relatively small acquisition. I mean, great for four people, but And I believe Kehole was around thirty five million, I think. I'm being sort of facetious about the total insignificance of the zip dash uh acquisition because Google would of course, you know, stick them in this backwater thing that they would work on that nobody would care about, which would be the

28:29 mobile version of Google Maps. Which of course is now like By far the, you know, ninety plus percent of the business and one of the most important applications uh in history. Back to the launch in February two thousand five of Google Maps. The night before launch It got slash dotted. Remember slash dot? Oh man, yeah. That was like uh that was like getting dug before dig. I know, I know. So great, or tech memed now or you know, I mean it's still up. Like you can I think you can still I don't know if there's traffic, but like There's writers. Yeah. Oh, I remember going to Slashdot like literally every day. It looks the same. I mean, this is crazy. Oh man.

29:13 It's not even the way back machine. Yeah, like somebody published something this morning. This is this is like it's still a news site. Wow. So Slashdot, of course, for listeners who uh don't remember or weren't alive, was you know sort of the tech meme equivalent. It was it was the user um generated and posted news site for technology. uh back during this era.

29:34 getting slashed added, quote unquote, was if your application or service or product or what have you made it to the top of the slashdot boards, uh you would get just a ton of traffic. I'm reading the about Slashdot was created in nineteen ninety seven by Rob Commander Taco Malda. I remember Commander Taco. He would he was like the the username on all the posts. Yes. Oh so great. People find out about this impending or kind of re well, not even relaunch of of where to because Expedition was, I don't believe, ever launched publicly and it was desktop software, but the launch of Google Maps coming uh the night before, it gets slash dotted with the URL of Google.com slash maps. And so when they

30:15 launch the next day and announce the product, it they just get a ton of traffic. Ton of traffic. But that doesn't equate to immediate success for the product. And and actually according to uh according to Brett Taylor and many of the histories out there, for about a year it was like Okay. It got some usage, but certain MapQuest and and Yahoo maps were, despite being obviously inferior in many ways, were

30:38 We're still the the the leading products out there on the web. Over the next year, though, they do two things that are really important. Uh one that is sort of like Fundamental that was starting to be well known and I feel like Google was way ahead of the curve, but now is like obvious which is that they rewrote the app. It was really slow and they rewrote it for speed. So like Google understood that speed of loading of web pages, search results, you know, everything. I mean it was one of their primary value propositions for for why Google won. Not only was it the best results, but it was the fastest results. It was instant. And so they rewrote all of the software. They made Google Maps actually performant and and fast. And that

31:18 Certainly helped a lot, and especially as the product scaled. Helped a lot. Two, though, on the distribution and uh uh sort of stunts side, they added satellite imagery to maps. And I vividly remember this in the in the satellite imagery, the the the aerial imagery they took from the Google Earth team from the Keyhole acquisition, and they they were able to bring it into maps and the web application. And so when this launched, People it was such a novelty. And I remember doing this. I remember my parents doing this. Everybody would go find their home. Go find my house. Go find my house and view it from a satellite. And that was like the key thing that like made um sort of like this estimate for Zillow that like it got made for the people using this. Yeah. It was like you were like, I saw this in a movie. Only the government can do this and now I can do it too. Yeah, yeah. And um there's a super, super fun story from Brett Taylor that uh he posted on Twitter that we'll we'll link to about naming this product feature, which of course is as we all know now called satellite view. When they were working on it, the maps team called it

32:22 Satellite view. But apparently the Earth team got really upset about this because Some of the images were from satellites. Right. But some of the images helicopters Yeah, were actually aerial from planes and helicopters. And so there was this kind of like holy war between the engineering teams about you can't call satellite view. It's like most of it's from planes. And and so they ended up having a um a a product review in one of the product reviews uh before the feature shipped with Sergey Brand is in the in the product review where they like the on the agenda was to finalize the name of this feature.

32:58 And apparently in typical Larry and Sergey fashion and especially Sergei, they were always doing, you know Nutty stuff. And Sergey was on this kick that Every meeting had to end on time. Every meeting he went to, he brought like a timer, like a countdown clock. And he would hit the countdown clock at the beginning of the meeting for, you know, forty five minutes or an hour or however long it was. And then when the clock reached zero. He got up and walked out, meeting was over. And whatever like decisions needed to be made, the current state of where things stood, that was the decision. So they're in this meeting and uh debating what to call it. And everybody's throwing out different names and Sergei's mostly in listen mode. And then the clock hits like ten seconds.

33:38 And Sergei says. Let's call it bird mode. And then the buzzer like goes off and he walks out. And everybody's looking around and they're like Are we really gonna call this bird mode? Yeah.

33:51 Uh so according to Brett, the the maps team goes back to work on it and they're really debating, like, we can't call this bird mode. That's ridiculous. And so they decide just not to do it. And they just leave the Satellite mode, you know, name in there. And then they ship the feature and nobody asked them ever again. And so they literally defied Sergei and they just Did it. And now satellite mode that we all know and love is satellite mode. This reminds me. Meanwhile, Microsoft uh shipped the org chart. I remember I don't know what it looks like today, but I remember in Bing Maps for the longest time there was both satellite, which was truly from satellites, but then there was also like

34:29 I don't know if they called it bird's eye or they called it helicopters, but or aerial perspective or something like that. And this was actually the helicopter shots, which for Nerds was pretty cool,'cause then what you could do is they crisscrossed in the sky like north to south, south to north, east to west, west to east, and you could actually rotate The perspective that you were viewing. And it it wasn't like at a 45 degree angle. It was maybe like a twenty degree angle or something, but you could actually like. Sort of seeing the what it looked like viewing not directly down, but sort of like slightly at an angle down and see when they did this. Yeah. Yeah. I remember like I'm like, this is cool, but like

35:08 Is this useful at all? All like and why would you have two different views for this? Yeah. But sure enough. I looked at my house and I looked at it from all four angles and I was like, This is pretty cool. Well, uh to be back in the mid two thousands. So By two thousand six, uh, once all these features had shipped, Google takes over MapQuest and Yahoo and becomes the largest

35:34 Internet mapping destination and provider in the world. In mid two thousand six. they release the maps API. And this was another like Water moment in web two dot oh development is developers Go nuts with

35:50 access to the maps at Google Maps API and they start creating mashups. Do you remember mashups, Ben? No. Oh, Google Maps mashups were such a thing. It was like the tech world meme of, you know, two thousand six to Two thousand nine. All sorts of applications get built showing, you know, overlaying uh crime data or you know, any of the points of interest data or whatever people are just like taking the underlying maps And the the dynamic nature of it, embedding it in their web pages, layering data over it. Super cool stuff gets built. Uh my favorite was do you remember Pad Mapper? Did you ever use that? Oh yeah, for sure. Yeah. So Pad Mapper is a Google Maps matchup. That yeah, that makes sense. I mean that's how I f I found uh an apartment that way. Like until at least Craigslist got all huffy and and shut him down for scraping. Yeah. And this was I mean

36:40 This is uh fun stories here, but like th this release the API the developer interest in mashups and people starting to do this, this leads to things like Trulia, things like Zillow, things like Uber. You know, none of this would be possible without the Google Maps API. Which for a while we should say was free. It was a maybe a Google growth strategy, but maybe just Google saying like We love making things that make the web better. And so if you wanna use Google Maps for your own thing, it's it's free. And then if you're really using it a lot, it's pretty cheap. Until recently.

37:15 I worked for a year at the Wall Street Journal after investment banking and before uh moving to Madonna and getting into venture capital. And during that year we started doing a bunch of matchups and work with Google on the uh uh with maps. And we spent a ton of time with the maps biz dev team trying to figure out how we you know, could we use this for free? Did we have to pay for it? How much did we have to pay for it? Also it's it took Google a little while to figure this out. I think they've uh Got a pretty good business model now. Also, listeners, uh quick update on my last comment. Uh I'm on Bing Maps right now. They no longer have the uh they have an aerial feature, but it is effectively satellite view, and there is not a way to rotate around your favorite buildings in four slightly different angles. Oh sad. There's just one problem with all of this though.

38:02 This might actually be I bet this is why it took so long for Google to fulon out the API business model, which is that Google and Google Maps were completely dependent on mapping data. From other

38:18 data providers and satellite companies, the two largest of which were Tele Atlas and Navtec. And In two thousand seven, both of those companies got acquired. I may mix this up, but I think Navtech got acquired by Nokia. And Tele Atlas got acquired by TomTom. It may be the other way around, but they're both fairly large acquisitions. And they had a dual poly on satellite. map and uh navigation data providing. And so they would sell their data and images to all the car companies that were putting GPS uh and maps into screens in their vehicles. They would sell to Garmin. They would sell uh TomTom obviously was making their own standalone GPS devices. Uh and They would sell to

38:59 Map quest and Yahoo Maps and Google Maps. So Google knows that this is a dependency that they're not too excited about. Also in early two thousand seven. Larry and Sergey are back on the Stanford campus, where of course they were PhD students and Google was started. And they meet up with uh someone who I assume they knew and were friends with, who was computer science professor Sebastian Thrun.

39:22 Who at the time was a computer science professor at Stanford, and he was running two really important projects. One was Sale. the Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, and two was the Stanford's team in the DARPA challenge. And He and uh Stanford's team had just won the two thousand five DARPA challenge. The DARPA challenge, of course, was the uh challenge to create an autonomous vehicle that could navigate

39:49 a pre set out course and terrain in the desert. And so Sebastian. uh and his lab were like at the forefront of all of the things that would go into ultimately autonomous, but a huge component of that is mapping navigation data. All of these things. Sebastian told Larry and Sergey that he is actually in the process of with a bunch of his grad students starting a startup to work on one aspect of this. It was gonna be called Vuotool. V-U-T-O-O L. Great uh really great product name. And they had a crazy idea that they were going based on their work in the DARPA challenge, they knew

40:26 all these things that were important. They were gonna drive around the streets of America With Cars. Driven by human drivers, but with big cameras on top. And they were gonna use these cameras to take pictures of Everything.

40:40 And A, that was gonna have pictures of everything. Uh, but B, it was gonna be data that was gonna be incredibly useful for this future of navigation and autonomous vehicles and all of that. Which was not a thing that the public was in any way talking about. That w that was five years out. I mean I remember the DARPA challenge from back when I was in in school uh at Princeton uh at the same time. We had a DARPA challenge team. team. I mean all the major universities did. So it was something that like academics and engineers were thinking about, but just nowhere near mainstream. But it was like twenty twelve, twenty thirteen before the tech community started getting buzzy about ooh, autonomous vehicles might be a thing sometime soon. Yeah, it was totally in Science project territory.

41:20 You could argue maybe it is still in science project territory. But it definitely was then. So Larry and Sergey they hear all this from um From Sebastian, and of course they know on their minds is this dependency problem on teleatlas and nav tech. And uh they say, we're gonna buy you. immediately. So they do, and of course this turns into Google Street View. But Street View itself, as we were talking about, was never The only goal of the project. Although Street View was super cool and it it was a whole nother round of just like when there were satellite imagery. Everybody goes and looks at their house. Um but uh so it was great marketing for Google Maps.

42:00 Using that data, Google starts internally a project called Ground Truth. And this is led by Megan Quinn, who was a uh product manager uh at Google at the time. She would go on to Square and then Kleiner Perkins, and now she's a GP at Spark Capital, uh and an investor and board member at Rover.com. One of the many illustrious Google Maps PM alumni. So she leads this project, and what they're doing with all the engineering talent at Google is basically taking The data. And the images from the street view cars and using that and interpolating it in ways such that they can get everything they need from that.

42:35 And they don't need to buy Tell Atlas and Navtec data anymore. Talk about another unique and amazing technology problem to solve is we're gonna take, you know, these whatever it is, nine cameras or something that are mounted in this crazy way on top of this car that are all taking these still images. And of course, like there's the difficult thing of stitching them together nicely for street view, but we're gonna be able to extrapolate structure data that serves to create our maps by just taking these lat long coordinates from the moment that these pictures were taken and all these pictures and actually derive map data from that. Frickin' amazing. Incredible engineering project. It takes a little bit of time, as you would imagine, but They have to drive their cars around all of America to get it. Uh but by October two thousand nine, so they acquire Vootool in in two thousand seven early two thousand seven. By October two thousand nine

43:29 Google boots out. Navtech and teleatlas and they are officially only using their own Google data. Uh for maps.

43:38 And that then and I think it was right around then. And now that I'm remembering this is when I was at uh the Wall Street Journal. It was right around then that they open up the business side of the Google Maps API and they start uh charging to license out the maps API. continuing Ben's quest of playing with mapping software in real time while doing the episode, um there's a really cool feature you can do uh because you know these cars are still actively driving around all over the place capturing all this data where you can actually in Street View go and change the year that you are looking at. So in the top left corner, if you hover over the little clock. you can adjust. I'm on Mercer right now in Seattle. You can adjust from twenty fifteen to twenty nineteen. And even in those few years, it's crazy to watch how much the city gets built up and how much that road changes. And I think on average r roads tend to have four or five years of historical data there, but it is like the coolest thing to go in this time machine and look at what they captured today versus what they captured over let's see, I can go back to twenty fourteen over here. And it it's it's wild to watch the change over time.

44:45 Wow, I didn't know you could do that. That's really cool. Yeah. I found it in a deep. Way too much time on the internet, Google images click around session. Um Okay, so apologies for the multiple jumps around in timeline here, but uh as recently Google Maps like this becomes such a foundational product and technology to so many things. And of course, I'm sure what is on everybody's minds and people probably remember, uh, going back to the zip dash uh acquisition, uh

45:14 is mobile. What's going on with mobile for Google Maps. So What's what's go back again to two thousand seven. Two thousand seven. Great year. Year I graduated from college. But it was also What else did h happen in two thousand seven? It was the year of the Jesus phone. Yeah. Remember it was called the Jesus phone? I do. Oh my goodness. I mean if any phone was a Jesus phone, it was the iPhone. Um People uh probably remember when the iPhone

45:43 shipped. There were no third party applications on it. Everything was built by Apple. But there were two apps that weren't entirely built by Apple and did have third party back ends and those were Maps, powered by Google Maps. And

45:57 YouTube. Power by YouTube. And those beautifully skew morphic images. Like YouTube was that old T V instead of the YouTube logo. Oh. We're gonna be talking about Mr. Forestall in a minute here. This must have been in two thousand six. By this time, uh John Hanke of Niantic Fame had become the VP of the Geo Group, and so he both Earth and Maps were reporting up to him. And so one day, according to him, he's at his desk at Google and the phone rings and

46:25 And uh he picks it up and it's Steve Jobs. Just like the trip episode. Uh the EA episode with Trip Halkins. Steve just like So many episodes of Steve calling people and acquired. And so this is a quote from from John. He says Steve Jobs called me at my desk to ask me to help out on a project. He wouldn't tell me what it was. But of course I knew. uh we worked closely with Apple to get maps ready for the launch of the first iPhone, which opened up so many possibilities. So at iPhone launch, when uh Steve Jobs announces it on stage in January two thousand seven, uh, like we said, maps and YouTube are the only third party

46:59 Apps on the iPhone. Except they're not. Really. So what happened was They work closely with Google and YouTube on these, but it's actually Apple engineers and Apple designers that are building the apps based on the backends and the APIs from Google. So

47:16 Google has no control. Think about that time, like how There there was no iPhone SDK. Everything was th there was no separation between being a platform engineer and being an application engineer as far as iPhone OS went. So of course it had to be Apple engineers because like There were no like APIs that were optimized for performance. You were writing like directly interfacing at a very direct level and you to be very careful that you weren't doing anything that would, you know, just cause the app to crash every time or worse, you know, something the operating system level. We'll have to see if we can find and link to in the show notes. There's great

47:50 Uh great retrospectives and histories with people. I think on the 10th anniversary of the iPhone talking about how duct tape it all was together in the first version. Especially that demo, that onstage demo, where it was actually like three different phones that were used during the course of it because it couldn't all work on the same phone. And they'd choreograph the entire thing like if Uh Steve touched one thing at the wrong time or went off script, like the whole demo would crash. Anyway, so Apple is controlling everything about the UI of maps on the phone. Uh, Google's just providing the data. But of course, Google is also working on the smartphone. of operating system of their own in Android, which they acquired in two thousand five. Two thousand five was a big four or five was a big time of acquisitions for Google. We of course covered that on our on our Android episode. So then in two thousand

48:38 Eight. When Android launches, of course it has Maps and Google Maps on it. And then when they update it in two thousand nine, the next year with Android two point oh Google Ads.

48:50 Turn by turn navigation. Who needs your Tom Tom anymore? on Android. And this is Huge. I mean, people knew at the time this was like the death knell of Garmin and TomTom and Navtech and all these companies. Like they I didn't go back and look it up, but I think their stocks dropped to like like thirty percent on the day of announcement and they're, you know, worthless now. Meanwhile, though, like y Google Maps for the iPhone, it you just see your blue dot. You know where you are.

49:17 directions but like you can't get anything live. Yeah, r remember tapping through like, Oh, I've made this turn now. Now I'm gonna tap it, I'm gonna go look what the next time. I'm gonna tell the phone that I have moved. Barbaric. Who knows what was going on in discussions between the two companies. You could paint a picture where Google wanted to add turn by turn navigations to maps on the iPhone, but they couldn't because they didn't control the UI. But then as the two companies start fighting over the smartphone wars in this era. Um the turn by turn navigation is a killer, killer feature for

49:50 Android. There were turn by turn apps available on the app store for iOS, but they were like fifty or a hundred dollars that you had to pay, remember? Right. Yeah.'Cause I think Tom Tom had one of them. Uh yes, Tom Tom did. I th maybe Garmin too. Uh, we talked about this on on the Ways episode, which we'll refer to in a minute, as all this is deteriorating. Oh, also I have in my notes here. Remember when Microsoft bought Nokia as part of this? Oh my goodness. An era best forgotten in time. That was just like an arbitrary dig. Like you just dug that out of nowhere just to have a dig. Well, I just you know, we haven't talked about it on Acquired yet, and I feel like It had to come up at some point in time.

50:32 Time marches on. We get to two thousand twelve. It's W D C And Rumors are swirling. that Apple is gonna make a major move in the wars with Android.

50:45 They're gonna release IOS six. Major update and the marquee feature. is they are booting out Google. They are launching their own Mapping service.

50:56 Apple maps. It's gonna be insanely great. And who comes out on stage to introduce it. But Scott. Forest all the time.

51:04 Yeah. And uh We won't be hard to I mean. It's so hard to build a mapping service. I mean I think Well and especially one where you're starting ten years after the the your your competitor. Yeah. I mean not quite ten, but but everything we've talked about on this episode from where to to keyhole to zip dash All the work internally to Street View and Vuotool.

51:28 All of this over the years that all this engineering that Google has put into maps And Apple I don't know how long they were working on Apple Maps internally. Um I'm sure a couple of years. Like and I'm sure that they realized it was a huge thing and they I mean they had cars driving around, people sort of were

51:46 posting pictures on MacRumors dot com of uh the Apple cars driving around. Like it w they were they were definitely putting in a a a huge amount of money and effort. But In the meantime, Google was doing not only all this engineering, but they had billions of people, well, probably hundreds of millions of people at this point in time. using their services and getting all that data back from them. And so when Apple Maps finally ships in September twenty twelve with the release of iOS six,

52:11 Google Maps is gone. So Google's completely booted out. You cannot get Google Maps on the iPhone anymore. Your only option is Apple Maps or a third party application of which Google is not on there. And Apple Maps did have turn by turn. Uh Apple Maps did have turn by turn. But if you followed the turn by turn directions, you might not necessarily end up where you wanted to go. The machine says. And that I mean there were stories of this happening all over the world. Uh And uh the only thing worse than not having turn by turn navigation on your map app on your phone is having turn by turn navigation that sends you to the wrong place within days of of this happening. And we we covered this on on the Waze episode. Apple apologizes, letter from Tim Cook. Letter from Tim Cook, not from not from Scott Forestall. Scott Forrestall.

53:06 The writing was on the wall. Yeah. Yeah, the writing was on the wall there. Quickly Scott is um it's geomorphism in total is uh is uh removed from Apple And as part of the letter, Tim says, We recognize this as Unacceptable. We are working to make Apple Maps better. Uh here is a list of third party applications that you can get in the app store that are alternative mapping applications to use in the meantime. One of those that he lists is Waze. And of course we cover this on on our Waze episode, which uh everybody can go listen to for the history there. What everybody wants is Google Maps. Google Maps is the best. Yeah, they hadn't done the rewrite for iOS yet. They had not. So it was remember, Google was kinda caught footed here. There was no team internally that had built Google Maps for

53:51 IOS. So amazingly quickly, again, this was September twenty twelve when this happened. On December twelfth, twenty twelve. So Three months later. Google ships a third party application to the app store of Google Maps. And it's

54:07 Incredible. It's amazing. It's so good. It's so good. It is complete feature parody with Android Google Maps, including turn by turn navigation. In many ways, people think it was at the time better designed, better looking, better flow, and within two days it is installed on over 10 million

54:28 IOS devices. It is like a a tall cool drink of water in a desert. So two two quick personal stories on this. One, uh I remember like the halls of Office for iPad uh or the Apex team at Microsoft were a buzz when this came out because everyone's downloading it, everyone's analyzing their user interface paradigms. This was the first time that Google had really nailed that trade off of distinctively Google. But um sensibly iOS. And it was their their sort of first of many really great iOS apps that felt Googly but also felt iPhony. All of us were sort of like tearing it apart and trying to to understand, you know, d what d should we be taking cues from this in in Office for iPad. The second fun personal story there is The team that built

55:14 that app was actually Kirkland based. It was Google Kirkland. It was a small team. I remember there were four core people on the team and I went to a presentation by them on how we built Google Maps for iOS like three months after they launched it. th they basically said, like, look the the whole API surface was already written for Android. Like we just needed to be really good iOS engineers and connect to the right services. Like not that it wasn't that hard, but like it actually was architected really nicely for us to just sort of make an iPhone app that that you know, we just had to be objective C experts. It really shows the power of all the work that Google had done to this point that just in a few months there they could make something really nice. T. Pull forward from Playbook and maybe we can mention them again then, but but

55:58 One, I think all of this episode just highlights people talk about Google being an engineering driven organization and having incredible engineering uh resources and talent. And like this is it. I mean, better than anyone else on the planet. Nobody else could do this. Everything that they did with maps over the now fifteen years uh that it's been around, the incredibly architected backend and API service such that within three months a team that is an incredibly talented team can build one of the best iOS applications in the world at that time.

56:31 and use this this API backend and not need to worry about it. And then ship it to the app store and and now Google Maps is one of the most downloaded and installed iOS apps of all time. Uh Pretty incredible. Yeah. I also remember one big thing that made it so good was uh when it was still the Apple version.

56:51 Apple's app was connecting to an older backend that used the static tiles and had to re-download new tiles for whatever your sort of zoom level was. Where when Google regained control over the front end by being able to ship their own app, they could connect to their V two dot O or whatever it was, APIs that actually had the vector maps. So the suddenly the the all the scrolling was much smoother um and zooming. And actually this is when they introduced that gesture. And for anybody who hasn't used this If you don't use this and you're learning this from me for the first time, this is gonna blow your mind to make your life better. Instead of pinching On Google Maps, you can actually double tap and then move your thumb up or down to change your scroll level. So you can use Zoom. one handed by just holding your phone instead of holding it with one hand and pinching with the other hand.

57:39 Oh that's awesome. I did know that, but I had forgotten that. It's huge. That's huge. Life changing here on Acquire. So we're gonna end history and facts here. definitely go check out our Ways episode. our Android episode.

57:53 to hear more of the history around this and ways especially kinda picks things up from here because Google A couple months after this, Waze gets a huge traffic boost and download boosts from Tim Cook's letter, where Waze is one of the applications he recommends. And rumors start swirling that Apple's gonna now buy Waze to fix their maxing mapping problem. then the rumor starts whirling that Facebook is gonna buy Ways because they wanna be a, you know, internet portal too and have a mapping solution for some reason. Ends up Google buys Ways for one point three billion dollars in June of twenty thirteen. And then progress marches on till today. One last little coda uh before we

58:30 leave the history and move on to acquisition category. I think this was a One of our carve outs on the Zappos episode with Alfred Lynn. Justin O'Burn did three wonderful, wonderful uh long form blog posts uh in the last couple of years.

58:46 comparing the development of Apple and Google Maps over the last uh over the last uh few years. Um we'll link to them in the show notes. If you're really into all the technical aspects and like detailed minutiae of mapping and business models around this. Go read Justin's post. They're really, really great. I've got a couple of fun uh catch ups from this story to today. The first is what did the Rasmussens do at Google after

59:11 Moving on. I know the answer to this. Uh But the well the real question is, do you know what Lars went and did after this? But of course what they go and do is Google Wave. Google Wave. Oh, I remember when that was launched. I was so hype on that. I watched Lars's live stream of like here is the the platform that's gonna change the freaking world. It was super cool. I mean, the crazy thing like Uh.

59:37 One of the main meta themes on acquire that we keep talking about is like The tech world is a small place. Old ideas are new again. Everything comes around. They were right. Like they were completely right on the need for this. And the need for it the product that met that need was Slack. It was n not Google Wave. Sort of. It was like Slack plus Notion'cause it was also it was like a document surface in addition to being chat.

1:00:01 That's true. That's true. And so the you know, it'd be interesting to think about like, was it just that the timing was wrong? Was it that they got the product wrong of trying to be Slack plus notion all in one product? Uh w we'll never know necessarily, but yeah, Google Wave. So then do you know what Lars went and did? After Google Wave. I know the company that he started that he's running now that before that. Ooh, I do not.

1:00:23 He went to Facebook. I don't know if he's a uh conceived of and launched, but he was a key executive on Facebook for work, which is Facebook's attempt to uh to compete with uh to compete with Slack be in this market.

1:00:38 Uh, which we have heard from listeners. I think we uh we may have denigrated Facebook for work in the past, and uh we've heard from some listeners that they really like it and that it's rolled out at scale inside their organization. So that's definitely a quietly large and successful product. Yeah, within Facebook. So Yeah, super fun. Lars's new company is called Weave.io. Weave not to be confused with Wave. And it is a like musical BPM syncing service that uh their first thing is a running app that I'm excited to try out. Yeah, yeah. Well you've been doing a lot of running lately. That's true.

1:01:12 And then one last update, the uh fourth co founder of We're two, Noel Gordon, is the only one of the four who is still uh working at Google. So their fourth co founder um retired a few years ago, the Rasmussen's obviously are are are gone, but Noel Gordon is still a Googler. Oh. Fifteen years later. Yep. All right listeners.

1:01:33 Now is a great time to thank our longtime friend of the show, ServiceNow. If you are running a large enterprise, AI agents are likely spread across every team, and deploying them is uh no longer the hard part. Yeah. The hard part is knowing what permissions they have, what employees are using them for, or what decisions AI is making. AI security for an enterprise at scale is not a small concern. Like the risks Are real.

1:02:00 Exactly. And the challenge with AI is governing it, securing it, measuring it, and making sure that it actually delivers value. That is why ServiceNow built the AI control tower. Yep, AI control tower gives enterprises a single place to see, manage, govern, and optimize AI across the entire business. And it works with Any AI, not just theirs. Every device on your network, every permission across every system. Every AI agent visible and secure in one place.

1:02:27 And ServiceNow can do this because they've spent more than twenty years building the operational backbone of the enterprise, the workflows, governance, approval, security controls, and institutional knowledge that power how work actually gets done across IT, HR, customer service, finance, and security. ServiceNow already runs more than a hundred billion workflows annually and trillions of transactions for more than eighty-five percent of the Fortune five hundred. So when companies need a place to govern AI at enterprise scale, they're building on a platform at the center of how their business already operates. And in a future, that isn't going to be one AI, it's going to be thousands of AI agents working across every function of the company. But the question is, Who's managing them all? So if you're trying to turn AI ambition into real business outcomes and make it work safely, securely at scale,

1:03:16 Go check out service now.com slash acquired and tell'em that Ben and David sent you. Well should we move on to acquisition category? Yep, let's do it. I think it's a technology acquisition with Where Two. Uh walking through this, listeners, this is where we select whether it the the acquis or the main value that was acquired was people, technology, product, a business line, uh an asset, which is what we decided that wave. uh I'm sorry, that Waze was, since it was sort of a uh the data that Waze contained and the data that would be generated on an ongoing basis in the future, or other, which gives us the uh ability to come up with new stuff every episode if we want to. But I think this is pretty squarely a technology acquisition. that they transitioned into launching their own product.

1:04:03 Yeah, that makes sense. I mean you could make an argument for product, but it wasn't like it was Google Maps, they lay it at status Google Maps. Like it really like a lot of the work and building was was done within Google and it was the technology uh that they uh that they acquired that Went to this. Alright, what would have happened otherwise?

1:04:22 Oh man. That's a really good question. Like would Google have done this internally without buying wear two and would it have been successful if they did without the Rasmussen's and the the rest of the where two team. Thank you and

1:04:38 Uh and Keyhole and and subdash. Maybe Maybe I mean Yeah. Maybe maybe they would have gotten there internally eventually, but there was so many other things going on at Google at this point in time. The IPO obviously Gmail.

1:04:52 Everything that was happening then, all the other YouTube, uh, which of course they acquired, docs They certainly wouldn't have moved as fast. And then you think about Voodoo and acquiring That and stream maps. Well we didn't talk about then is Sebastian Thune uh goes on uh just like All of these alumni to do. So many amazing things. Uh founded Uacity, uh, started Google X within Google, and then of course Wamo and and that whole division and Google's autonomous.

1:05:17 Card division comes out of that. We're we're really throwing rocks on this episode, but I don't think Yahoo would have uh uh come up with all of that. There wasn't a logical other acquirer for them. I mean, Facebook was too early. And apparently made some decision that they didn't care about owning maps at some point. I think they use Bing Maps as their their solution now. I remember that. Um You know, Apple was ye uh almost a decade away from doing anything here. Uh if they were gonna

1:05:42 sell the company to someone, it was probably gonna be either Google or a legacy player. And uh then I guess w the other what would have happened otherwise is what if They had raised the Sequoia money. And what if the timing had been different by, you know, just enough so that they actually could close the deal. This is actually a good question. Did where to need Google.

1:06:03 In order to be a successful mapping product, or could where to have been its own thing. Where to would have raised hundred Southbank would have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in this company. Uh I mean Mapbox uh like literally Southbank invested three hundred million in Mapbox. Yeah. So Yeah. So uh we we have to go back to what was g happening at the time. I don't think this could have been a an independent company. I actually agree with Did they need Google for distribution? Uh maybe, maybe not. Um

1:06:36 Uh but I I I agree with Sequoia's decision to ultimately pass because m maybe they could have gotten distribution on their own. You know, certainly Flickr did, certainly YouTube did, although both of those companies, you know, sold and had sold way too early. But they could have been built as standalone companies. I think the problem here was the reliance on on uh Navtec and teleatlas data. Like if you're an independent startup. Are you gonna be able to negotiate with them Yeah. rates, especially since users are not gonna pay for the product. Like it has to be a free product because MapQuest and Yahoo Maps is free. So you're not gonna have a business model. You're gonna have to license all of this super expensive data.

1:07:15 And the business model the ingenious business model that Google ends up developing of the API here, that you can't really monetize until you free yourself from that data. And you can't free yourself from that model. Well, there's there's multiple businesses here. So yes, the certainly local advertising is the primary business model. But But you're gonna be hamstrung by that. And I think that would just be r h at the time have been really hard to do as an independent company because there was no way, even if you went public, you couldn't raise the amount of money that companies can raise now. And so they just wouldn't have had the access to capital to do this. Google has run this in the red for at least ten years, maybe more. There's no way that they would have had the leeway to do that at a b as a private company in that era. I mean and and when I say in the red, like way in the red. Like you think about the operational costs of driving all these vans around or paying someone else for that data, which wouldn't have been as good as the data that d data asset that Google has built up.

1:08:08 Um and back to back to a satellite for a minute. Uh in twenty fourteen, Google acquired Skybox Imaging, which is a satellite company. So Google is now owning, operating, and launching satellites into space to do all this. Could a mid two thousand startup have done this all independently? Hard to imagine. Thank you, right. Alright, so we move into playbook.

1:08:29 Yep, let's do it. So it's been a while since we did a classic acquired episode of sort of uh analyzing a big company that bought a small company and then grading if that was a good use of capital or not from A to F. Uh so I went back and and cloned an old script and uh you know my old one said tech themes. Which of course we now call the the playbook now, because I think when we used to do this section we were just sort of obsessed with uh abstractly what tech themes are there here. And uh we've we've definitely become more interested in what are the learnings from the actions that that Google took and where to took here that we can sort of extrapolate to use in future investments, companies we start, companies we work at. And so here I have playbook formerly known as tech themes. What is it?

1:09:15 The biggest thing that I'm taking away here is that Yen saw the future. That there could be a geovisualized search results page. And

1:09:27 This is an important distinction from Turn by turn directions with a map. It's it's if you have a rich canvas map and it's a full experience and in the future screens will get better and speeds will get better and everything, you know, all the technology will get better. A map is actually a great

1:09:47 platform interface for other things. Particularly search. And I think it's important to think about that when considering startup or product ideas. really l sitting in the nuance of

1:10:03 Th this is not a direct competitor to MapQuest. This has the potential to be something very different because we're gonna build it in such a way where it can be so much more than what MapQuest is. Yeah. There's two thoughts on that. One, you know, uh just the power of the interface. It's not just search. It's not just Google Maps. It's Uber. It's DoorDash, it's Zillow. Like none of these businesses would exist without Without Google Maps and without this

1:10:30 User interface paradigm. The other thing that it reminds me of is I'm trying to remember who said this to me. I think it might have been Kurt Delbeny, uh back uh former uh way early days acquired guest. Former venture partner uh at Madonna when we were all there and now uh head of strategy at Microsoft. We're looking at a company And I remember him saying to me, like It's very rare that you find an idea, a product or a company or an idea.

1:10:56 Yeah, think about it in terms of an idea. The more you think about it. The bigger it gets. And this is one of those ideas. Like the they're extremely, extremely rare. Uh and they they often come, you know, in camouflage. But when you find them

1:11:12 That's the time to go big. And and At this moment in time. As we were saying, there was no way to go big as an independent company. The only way to really do this was part of part of Google. Maybe Microsoft could have bought them or something, but But really Google was the natural fit here. At this time. Exactly. At this time. Yeah. Today. If you find yourself with an idea like this.

1:11:34 Well the first trick. And this is actually a big part of our jobs as venture capitalists, is like everybody, you know, might think they have an idea like this, but are you really, really intellectually honest with yourself And can people around you evaluate uh whether this truly is an idea of this category, of which Mm ninety nine point nine percent of ideas are not. But if you do have that Today you can build it as an independent company. And today you can become an enormous, enormous platform in and of yourself. And I think this really is, you know, everything comes back to SouthBank, but um for all the uh uh funny hijinks around South Bank, and uh we will cover many of them uh in our coming We Work IPO episode.

1:12:14 You know, I think this is the thesis that like with ideas like this, you can now fund them and build large independent companies and not have to be YouTube and sell to Google for a billion dollars. It's a good point. I think I don't remember if we talked about it on the show or not, but I feel like you and I had a conversation four or five years ago. And and I remember having this conversation a lot and saying

1:12:36 You know, n machine learning is becoming equivalent with software. In the way that in the early two thousands you said we're software. In the late two thousands you said we're an internet company. In the early twenty tens you say we're a machine learning company. Like it's table stakes to build a technology product. um especially a a large scale one is to use machine learning in some way. And I remember having this fear and definitely Startup innovation was capped because the big companies had all the data.

1:13:10 And the best products were gonna be built by Google and Facebook. Not because they had the most money But also that but because they had the most data. Exactly your point, for all the hijinks and criticism uh of of SoftBank It enables this. This way to flank that and says, Okay, yeah, but what if you had half a billion dollars? Yeah. Or what if you know your DoorDash? Like what if you have

1:13:33 Like three or four billion dollars. Like how about that? Can you compete? It it does actually in a world where data modes have become incredibly important, it does actually allow for startups to continue to have the ability to compete with these big companies. Yeah. Yeah. Well,

1:13:53 Uh so this is, you know, uh at the risk of being too uh waxing poetic here, which you could definitely accuse uh us on a on a on acquired uh all the time. But to zoom way out here, I think it's really cool. Like we started this show in twenty fifteen. So we've been doing it for four years now. And I think we've like witnessed uh and this show has has been chronicled uh all the changes that have happened of exactly what we're talking about. And and it's like when we started, we were focused on acquisitions and acquisitions that actually went well, and then acquisitions, and that was, you know, still at that time. People thought, you know, people were thinking about Yeah, you can build big independent companies, of course Facebook did and whatnot, but like

1:14:34 As VCs and as founders, you were still like, you know. Yeah, I could build something. I could get that. Half a billion billion dollar acquisition and the whole venture landscape was optimized around that, you know, most funds, most uh quote unquote early stage funds were in the two hundred to you know, maybe at the outsize five hundred million dollar.

1:14:54 Fund size and so a billion dollar acquisition of a portfolio company, that really was was meaningful. But today that's really completely changed. And so as you see on the show it's and to really dig into that, like let's say you own 10% at exit, that means you have a hundred million dollar return on that company if your fund size is is two hundred million. Like ideally it's not it shouldn't be your biggest exit. You should have a an exit that's you know, two to three X that size to really make the portfolio math start to pencil. But You know, it's a But you could string together a number of those and you could have, you know, a good fund. It's been a long time since we've covered an acquisition on this show. Most of what we do are IPOs or just stories of great companies, right? Because Now the opportunity is to build a great company and there's so much more capital available, not just from SoftBank, but from

1:15:40 Like Sequoia, for instance, which we'll talk about more on this season, just raise the twelve billion dollar global growth fund. So many Funds, new entrants, all sorts of things. And the goal is really find these types of ideas. And build them into really large independent standalone companies. Yep. Yep, yep.

1:15:58 There's a few other topics I want to touch before we sort of go to grading. So one is something we didn't talk about but I think was actually a really big piece of value creation for Google Maps, which was Google Map Maker. And uh Lars talks about this in a a talk that he gives six, seven years ago. It's an old YouTube video with like three thousand views. But basically

1:16:21 Th in order to build out maps, especially before they had all the The cars driving around with cameras really operationalized, they got a lot of their early data from relying on the passion of locals who I think were called Google Guides or Google Local Guides who wanted to improve digital maps for their area because they saw this dream of Oh my God, like my area no matter where I am in the world, should totally have a really rich, robust digital map for it. And and they figured out this great system of appointing local guides and earning points and community leaders emerged to really build the maps for their area. And it's

1:17:00 the totally the power of of UGC of user generated content business models where If you can organize people to do something that benefits them, I mean, people were excited to use the maps, but also have a little bit of uh of street cred around being a local guide, and your vision is big enough. And your vision is I want to make the world better in this way. Everyone should be able to digitally view a map of their area because of all the benefits that come with that. You can get a crazy amount of stuff for your business for free. And and in a sustainable and updatable way. And and and for a long time and and Google Mapmaker is not a tool anymore, but they still have variants of this um with people in in local communities updating information for them. You can claim your business and update all the info on it. Yep. Another point that I wanted to make was uh Lars in that same talk talks about how difficult it was for them to recruit to where to. It was the four of them. They wanted to hire all of their engineering friends. They couldn't because everybody thought that they couldn't make money from maps.

1:17:59 And I think it was even difficult to to recruit once they got into Google because the canonical wisdom was there's not a business there. And uh as we'll get into here in grading, there was. It was just fifteen years later. Yeah. Well, so lucky that Brett Taylor was already working on this and totally was the natural person to to move over and and help make this happen. And um have to imagine adding a Truly excellent PM to the team of engineers like that had a lot to do with how fast they shipped and how fast they iterated.

1:18:30 Do we wanna do value creation, value capture before diving into grading? Well, we could probably devote a whole episode to this here, you know, between the wars between the platforms and the moat uh that Google has built because of all this and uh uh how hard it is to compete. You know, we tal we talk alluded to Mapbox, which is like great infrastructure has potential, but like man, that's a large hill to climb to compete with uh Google Maps here. And especially the Ways acquisition and like I don't know, in the current antitrust environment, like would that have been allowed to happen? Probably not. At least it certainly I think would have been scrutinized a lot more than it was. I mean, I guess I'll this is a long winded way of saying I think.

1:19:08 Google Maps is a perfect example to me. of the kind of thing that Ben Thompson has been talking about for a couple of years now, of like antitrust needs to evolve in the current environment because Google Maps has created so much consumer surplus. It's free to use as a consumer. It's incredible benefits to like so many people's lives and so many other businesses. And yet because of that, it has this mode where it's effectively a monopoly. And it has been allowed to continue to purchase other

1:19:39 startup competitors to it. And like what does that mean for the future of innovation in the space? But no doubt in my mind. massively, massively value creating for the world that this product exists and that this acquisition happened. Zero doubt. Uh the interesting thing is like it has created so much value for the world, like And does that enable Google now to capture

1:20:01 So much value going forward that it becomes a problem. Which is a great way to g to to segue into grading, you know, of the a lot of times y the way to sort of think about value creation, value capture is a fair trade is to be able to capture Ten percent. of the value that you create for your customers. You know, at the very start of maps, Google was capturing zero percent. And the question is, how much are they capturing now from all this value that they're creating in the world? So

1:20:27 Going into grading. This is where I want to I want to make my case. The criteria that we use for grading, uh for for anybody who's joined the show in the last, I don't know, season and a half or something for for grading acquisitions is how good of an idea was it for the big company to buy the small company? Like an F is they lit the money on fire. Uh that that it it would have been better off in their bank account doing absolutely nothing or perhaps even buying a company that did less worse. You're referring to a uh burning platform or all time warner or Nokia or you know a variety of companies. An A plus is uh Instagram is our shining example. Booking.com is a great one to uh the the price line group buying that you know where you spend money and it becomes an enormous, enormous part of your business. Instagram Actually some great data that that came out today thanks to some reporting by the information. Facebook bought Instagram for a billion dollars and Instagram revenues were expected to surpass ten billion dollars in twenty eighteen after hitting one billion dollars just two years before. So I mean you think about like

1:21:31 Yeah, the enterprise value of Instagram is I don't know. Uh One to four hundred billion dollars. What is that? That's over three hundred percent annual growth over the last two years, starting from a billion dollar base. Oh my goodness. Yeah, so that's that's what an A plus looks like. So let's think about this. So let's start in the abstract.

1:21:51 Google's mission. is to organize the world's information. And make it easily searchable. Yeah. What maps does really is it organized the world's information geographically.

1:22:03 So it's this sort of like really, really nice extension of their mission. And Another thing to keep in mind for context here is to remember that Google despite being in Cloud computing, productivity.

1:22:19 Mobile operating systems, f making phones, making laptops, making home assistants, and all these other bets. Eighty four percent of the revenue for Google still comes from advertising revenue. Like four percent is Google Cloud, which they just started breaking out, and twelve percent is this others. So when you think about Google as a business. It is.

1:22:40 Ads and most of the ads is search ads, not the Does that include YouTube ads too, I think? Yes. The YouTube ads are included. I guess advertising that what they don't break out is what is search advertising for I don't think that they have over uh in different points in time sort of alluded to it, but It's not in their regular financials to break out sort of like YouTube advertising versus search advertising. So advertising is still the cash cow. Maps one decent allegory is maps is a lot like Facebook acquiring Instagram. Granted maps didn't come with its own user base, but um you know in the sense that it lets their existing

1:23:24 uh advertisers have access to more inventory and new and creative ways to reach users where they are. You know, YouTube is is similar YouTube actually uh is is estimated to be worth a hundred and sixty billion dollars, according to a Morgan Stanley estimate. So David is it is time for us to go and and revisit YouTube. Um we we analyzed that business and said from as best we can tell, it's still a breakeven business. You know, it it still is extremely expensive to run. We just did the episode too early. Yeah, well the funny thing is we did the episode Sort of like value investors.

1:24:00 You know, what are what are the gross margins on this business and you know, will it ever actually generate a profit? And We should have been doing it like tech investors or like public market investors who are willing to buy these IPOs who are saying, Wow, look how much revenue they're doing. Let's that's a hundred and sixty billion dollar market cap company right there within Google. It's being a little facetious, but uh you know, it really speaks to the difference between trying to value a business based on what you think it's either Udin economics or gross margins are today, and what you believe that scale will be able to uh let that business accomplish in the future. So Here I'm making this case that maps is kind of like YouTube, which is kind of like Facebook buying Instagram, which is take your existing advertisers, give them a new way to reach existing customers in a new inventory format that's valuable. So you know, what have the equity researchers sort of

1:24:53 think that Google Maps is doing as a business. Barrett Equity Research has estimated that in 2016 Maps could do 1.5 billion in revenue. Um and then in 2017 they estimated that uh as soon as 2020, Maps could do five billion in revenue. And you really start to see, you know, this business emerging where people are using Google Maps. as uh uh a place to go for search. And it's a different kind of search. It's not what lawnmower should I buy. I mean that's all happening over on Amazon, but They're really using it for I need to find something around me. And they're very open to suggestions. I mean, last year Google launched, or I think two years ago, they launched promoted pins on Google Maps. They just issued a change in the last six months that sort of made those larger and more prominent. But they're really starting to think about using the Google Maps surface, much like the search results surface.

1:25:43 Yeah. Uh feature request for any Google Maps folks who who are listening right now. So I still use Foursquare for Um I think you're weird in that, man. I well okay, but but here's why. So for for Google Maps folks who are listening. I hate the five star rating system uh of both Yelp and Google Maps. I think it's completely useless and doesn't give me any actual information. Foursquare has a ten point oh rating system.

1:26:14 And so when I run a search on Foursquare, they have two features. One, that you can use your finger to draw a geofense of where you want to search. I just still don't think you can do that on Google Maps. Like for me, like I'm looking for a restaurant in a very specific area that is not a rectangle that I can get to with map zoom. Two Um, the ability to differentiate between quality at that 10.0 granular level is super important to me because everything's a four star. And that just means like I wanna know. And I what I can tell Foursquare is show me ranked on a ten point oh scale within this very specific geofenced area that I've drawn what the best cafes are. And then I can like that is much more useful information to me than the current way you can search for such things on Google Maps. It's a it's a great feature request. And actually it Um, I I looked up last night to see what's Yelp do in revenue. Last year they did about a billion dollars. I mean th that could also be

1:27:06 Google's revenue. Like I could see a world where Google Maps continues to get better and better. They encourage people to do more and more local searches there. They control the operating system so they could get a little bit more heavy handed for how most people, or at least fifty percent of America and most of the world, begin to look for things in the real world. It seems very plausible to me that There's five, ten billion dollars of advertising revenue that Google could see come from the mapping product. And if if you're looking at it that way, I mean it could well be as as big as an advertising platform as Instagram is.

1:27:39 Yeah. Yeah. Then you have The API licensing. Uh and I haven't dug into the finances there. But it's Tough.

1:27:48 Uh what you can do uh the the new pricing is uh seven dollars per thousand requests. So it's a seven dollar effectively CPM. So any app that wants to so DoorDash is paying seven dollars per thousand times someone looks at a map. And there are five million customers with API keys for uh for Google Maps. And so Tough tough to quite understand how much of the Google Maps business is attributable to the the API versus uh versus search ads. But The potential is there. Yep, for sure.

1:28:19 For sure. So when I when I look at this versus Waze, you know, let's say that uh this acquisition, just to put a number in the air, is uh where to was maybe 10, 20 million dollars. Waze was a billion dollars. you look at the revenue potential from maps. And and probably what they're doing now being single digit billions, maybe in the next couple of years getting to five billion. Yeah.

1:28:43 It's a much m better revenue business. They're generally a lot more revenue from Google Maps than they are from Waze, and they paid a heck of a lot less for it. Now, of course, the amount of the billions of dollars they've poured into building the asset over time, you know, that that's actually, I think, the the right way to to sort of analyze this. But You know. Um just for from the acquisition itself, paid way less to buy the company and seeing significantly more upside than Ways. I in this case this is it's truly warranted to say

1:29:14 The financial aspect is only one part of grading here and probably not even the most important. because it's everything we've been talking about. This is fundamental infrastructure. For so much of the internet and

1:29:29 beyond the internet going forward as you think about autonomous vehicles if and when they should ever uh become mainstream. Um that this asset is so, so valuable. And they bought it for, you know, so we know it was thirty seven million dollars for zip dash and um keyhole. It's one of the silly. It's silly, right? They've probably how many billions of dollars really creating it. But but it was as we talked about, if they hadn't bought these companies, I don't think it would have bubbled up internally. Certain not as fast to be working on these things. And the mode that they have

1:30:06 In fact, one of Justin O'Byrns' pieces called Google Maps Moat. The moat is so wide at this point. They have years and years Of advantages uh over any other competitor and that gap keeps getting wider. Anyway. It's funny you mentioned self driving cars,'cause I think if we had done this episode a couple years ago, I would have been

1:30:27 more inclined to grade on how helpful has it been to self-driving cars, but in spinning Waymo out and that market developing slower Then we all sort of I don't know. Yeah. And it feeling like Google's not necessarily a clear winner there.

1:30:45 It's I I feel like less of the value that Google Maps is gonna provide is is coming from self driving cars in the next I don't know, five years or something. That may be true. But what's interesting though is like to me it comes back to the API. Forget self driving cars. What about Uber? What about Zillow? How many more businesses are gonna be built on the Google Maps API? I don't think we're done yet. No, I think you're totally right. Um this is an A for me. Yeah. Yeah. Well I think they yeah. Uh for me too. The question is is it a is it an A plus A plus.

1:31:15 I mean with Instagram it's like they've on every dimension strategic. Asset base. And financial returns. It's a knock it out of the park. The reason why I think this is an A and not an A plus when you just compare it to Instagram is Instagram is a pure tech business. Like they've built

1:31:33 uh an incredibly asset light Pretty I'm gonna say easy to maintain, even though there's tons of people working on it. Uh but basically like super high fixed costs, almost no variable costs. and except for like cost of revenue to go and acquire the advertisers that are that are putting the ads on it. But crazy high gross margin business. When you look at this, the maintenance costs of keeping the maps up to date, to adding the expected functionality, to doing all this stuff in the physical world, it's it's meaningfully

1:32:03 Higher. I'm with you. A so there so our only A pluses remain Instagram and next? Uh, did I think booking. Oh, was was booking an A plus or an A? If it wasn't we were s wrong. Okay. We're uh either actual grading or revised grading, the A plus Pantheon is

1:32:23 next Instagram and Fucking. Yeah. Maps doesn't quite make it. But it's very close. And we'll see over the next few years too. I think it could uh I think it could emerge. The two big takeaways are one it's m fundamental structure to the internet as we know it today that they're gonna monetize through charging for that API. And two, um, it's an ever increasingly common

1:32:46 Basically new search page. And Google makes all their money on the search page. Yep. There we go. Very compelling argument.

1:32:53 We want to do a bit of follow up? Yeah, so um I messed something up on the Shopify episode that I I wanted to talk about. Um that was our last episode, not including the quick take that we did on DoorDash. And that was uh Shopify Actually powered. forty one billion dollars of sales last year, not fourteen billion, uh as discussed toward the end of the episode. That fourteen billion number that we talked about was the fourth quarter number, so uh I guess we way discredited the incredible amount of um commerce that that Shopify powers. So while this changes the analysis of the value captured that we did at the epis at the end of the episode, where Shopify actually only capturcent of the merchant sales uh as their own revenue, not the 7%.

1:33:40 uh which admittedly is is very different. I don't think it changes the overall sentiment that we had on the company as as discussed in the episode. Any thoughts on that, David? The only other thing I'd add. Especially given this episode and the just uh we' we've talking about the platform that Google Maps has built and the ability for and power of companies to be built on that platform. I I'm starting to think Shopify actually is a similar opportunity. Uh that you could think about like

1:34:06 I think you might be able to build really big companies that use Shopify and Shopify's customers as a platform and in particular Shopify Fulfillment that was just launched, which is not them doing their own fulfillment. It is it is a wide open door for new logistics and fulfillment providers to come in and serve all of Shopify's customers with a very easy uh distribution channel and customer acquisition. So um I'm even more bullish on um Shopify's potential as a platform. Yeah. Very much agree. And interestingly, that's predicated on there being a huge total addressable market out there, because if we think about this

1:34:41 So Shopify, I mean it's not a marketplace business, so it's not a take read, but if you think about it this way They capture two and a half percent of the value that they create as their own revenue. If you think about Uber.

1:34:55 Uber captures Close to thirty percent. Of the value that they create as revenue for themselves in the form of a take rate. That's marketplace assign where the platform itself is doing a lot of the work. Um if you look at uh uh you know Airbnb marketplace assist do you know what the take rate there is, David? It's like the teams or something? It's about fourteen percent, or at least historically on average. So so less of the value is sort of being provided by the platform than Uber, because Uber actually assigns you someone. When you bring

1:35:27 supply to demand. You're entitled to take much more of the economics than if you just provide a platform and then say to someone, go find all your own customers. And I think that that was sort of an interesting takeaway for me. um in analysing the the percentage of total value they're capturing.

1:35:46 Yeah. Well it comes to act at the end of the shop episode, which we talked about of It's not a network effect business, uh, although there are network effect aspects to it. It's a platform. And it's Bill Gates definition of a platform is you are captur less of the value than you are creating. And what's cool about platforms like Google Maps is they provide a wide open opportunity for businesses to be built on top of them and especially businesses. So if you're if you're building a marketplace business on uh Shopify or anything resembling a marketplace business, please come talk to me. Carbouts?

1:36:20 Carve outs. I'm gonna do a mashup of one of your recent carve outs, uh, which is the expanse. I started reading uh not yet watching the TV show. I want to read the books. I started reading the books of the expanse uh series. They are so good. So so good. I finished the first one. I'm in the second one. I think there are maybe nine in total. Um Uh, so it's gonna keep me occupied for a while, but uh really, really great stories.

1:36:44 I heard the books are great. I did the latest thing and watched the TV show. It's good. I'll watch the T V show eventually. Uh books or T V show, take your pick. Great. Great sci fi stories.

1:36:54 Yeah. Yeah. David, as you alluded to early in the episode, I've been doing a lot of running recently. I ran my first marathon on uh Sunday this past weekend. Uh and that means that I've listened to a lot of podcasts in in my training. I always thought I'll never listen to podcasts when I run. Like I I need something I need music, I need that to be sort of like fast and motivating and I can't like not focus on the running It turns out

1:37:18 Like when you're doing lots and lots of miles. having a distraction is actually pretty nice and being able to z to to not focus on the steps is quite nice. So um one of the episodes that I listened to during the marathon was an episode of The Moment with Brian Coppelman, uh who you may remember me raving about is the one of the co-creators of Billions. on a a previous carve out. So he has this this podcast. The podcast itself is very cool because uh he talks to people from uh sort of all walks of life, but really dives into Creativity, creative process.

1:37:51 it's like lightweight psychoanalysis, but it's it's a lot of um making the unique work that someone does often in a very archaic way understandable and digestible to a broad audience. And that's very similar to what he did in Billions. It's very similar to what he did in Rounders. And uh he interviews in this episode Mark Andreessen. And it's really fun to uh for listeners to this show, for myself, for David, we listen to people talk about Tech.

1:38:21 and venture capital and building big companies within our own circles a lot. And we get to hear it discussed at a Very micro Exactly, exactly. We all know what the terminology means. Every there's lots of expectations that it we all sort of have. There's lots of things that you can look over at another person and and know that they have the same fundamental basic assumptions that you do. Brian's show is not like that. And so it's very cool hearing Mark Andreessen explain venture capital to not you know, people who probably have never come in contact with it. It's just a really

1:38:54 Cool and a different perspective on it, I think. Super cool. I'm telling that. Yeah. All right listeners. Now is a great time to talk about one of our favorite companies, Statsig.

1:39:06 Yes, there is a reason why the best product teams rely on StatSig, whether they are iterating on their core product features or shipping AI powered experiences at scale. Yep. In the crazy speed of today's AI world. Shipping fast is just table stakes now. It's basically trivial to build and deploy your app constantly.

1:39:27 The real advantage is how quickly you learn what changes actually created value for customers and how fast you can use that signal to guide what you ship next. This is where StatsIG comes in. It brings experimentation, feature flags, and product analytics into one unified system so teams can ship safely, test rigorously, and directly link what they changed. to how users actually behaved. So if you want to make learning your competitive advantage, whether you're building new AI experiences or just evolving your existing core product, go to statsig.com slash acquired to get started. All right. That brings us home.

1:40:03 Listeners, if you aren't subscribed and you like what you hear, you should click the subscribe button in the podcast player of your choice. And if you want to become a limited partner, subscribing gets you access to our bonus show, where, as I mentioned earlier, we dive deeper into the nitty gritty of actually building companies rather than what we're doing on this show, which is reflecting on uh on sort of where they ended up. Um so if you are uh in the process of building company in any way, shape, or form. We'd love to have you join us and listen. You can click the link in the show notes or go to glow.fm slash acquired and all new listeners get a Free seven day trial. So with that.

1:40:39 We will see you next time. See you next time.

What you see above is a preview of the first minutes. One unlock costs 10 credits and covers this episode forever: full segment and word-level timestamps on this page, plus .txt, .srt, .vtt and word-level JSON downloads, as many times as you like.